ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7091595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed350 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_18.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17no data
1440p30no data
4K12no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 53 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18 no data
Counter-Strike 2 34 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Escape from Tarkov 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 14 no data
Fortnite 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 15 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 36 no data
Escape from Tarkov 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 13 no data
Fortnite 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 11 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 33 no data
Escape from Tarkov 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Escape from Tarkov 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 12 no data
Escape from Tarkov 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 1 May 2003
Chip lithography 10 nm 150 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Radeon 9200 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Radeon 9200 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or Radeon 9200 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.