Radeon 880M vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with Radeon 880M, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.71

Radeon 880M outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 349% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking644256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeStrix Point
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32768
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1450 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data139.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−94.1%
33
+94.1%
1440p30
−333%
130−140
+333%
4K11
−309%
45−50
+309%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
−300%
40−45
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%
Hitman 3 10
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Metro Exodus 22
−332%
95−100
+332%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
−333%
65−70
+333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 47
+67.9%
27−30
−67.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
−344%
40−45
+344%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%
Hitman 3 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Metro Exodus 16
−338%
70−75
+338%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+53.6%
27−30
−53.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%
Hitman 3 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−344%
200−210
+344%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−333%
130−140
+333%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Hitman 3 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 880M is 94% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 880M is 333% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 880M is 309% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 450% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 880M is 13% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 22 tests (96%)
  • Radeon 880M is ahead in 1 test (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.71 21.15
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm

Radeon 880M has a 349% higher aggregate performance score, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook card while Radeon 880M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
AMD Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.