GeForce4 MX 420 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with GeForce4 MX 420, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.34
+43300%

Graphics 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms MX 420 by a whopping 43300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7101573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)6 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed350 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data29 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.328 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_18.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17-0−1
1440p30-0−1
4K12-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 53 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 34 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 14 0−1
Fortnite 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 15 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 36 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 13 0−1
Fortnite 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 11 0−1
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 33 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 12 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.34 0.01
Recency 11 May 2021 6 February 2002
Chip lithography 10 nm 150 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 43300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 420 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce4 MX 420 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420
GeForce4 MX 420

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 27 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or GeForce4 MX 420, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.