GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking920not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeG71
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (4 years ago)12 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed350 MHz575 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data278 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data13.80
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-IV
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1.2 (full) 3.x (partial)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 12 October 2006
Chip lithography 10 nm 90 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV
GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 392 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.