Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs UHD Graphics P750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 16EU 750 P750 Xe DG1 Xe DG1 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9060 9060 XT 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT 16GB 9070 9070 GRE 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P750 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics P750
2021
15 Watt
4.20

RX 9060 XT 16GB outperforms UHD Graphics P750 by a whopping 1290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
UHD Graphics P750 UHD Graphics P750
RX 9060 XT 16GB RX 9060 XT 16GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking70244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.33no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)RDNA 4 (2025)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1no data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2021 (4 years ago)2 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1300 MHz2530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate83.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.6656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−1325%
171
+1325%
1440p5−6
−1460%
78
+1460%
4K3−4
−1500%
48
+1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
God of War 227
+0%
227
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 270
+0%
270
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
God of War 191
+0%
191
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 248
+0%
248
+0%
Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
God of War 149
+0%
149
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 154
+0%
154
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 273
+0%
273
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 233
+0%
233
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
God of War 96
+0%
96
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
God of War 79
+0%
79
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+0%
102
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+0%
91
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
God of War 53
+0%
53
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics P750 and RX 9060 XT 16GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 1325% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 1460% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 16GB is 1500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.20 58.37
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

RX 9060 XT 16GB has a 1289.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P750 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics P750
UHD Graphics P750
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics P750 UHD Graphics P750
vs
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
RX 9060 XT 16GB Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
vs
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
UHD Graphics P750 UHD Graphics P750
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile Intel Graphics G1 32EU Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Intel Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
RTX 3050 8 GB NVIDIA RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
UHD Graphics 750 750
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU Apple Pro 20-Core GPU
vs
UHD Graphics 750 750
RTX 4070 SUPER NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER
vs
Xe DG1 OEM OEM
RX 6600 XT 6600 XT
vs
RTX 5090 DD 5090 DD
UHD Graphics 48EU Intel Graphics 48EU
vs
RX 6600 6600
Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU Apple Max 40-Core GPU
vs
RX 6600 6600
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA SXM5 96 GB
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 3050 Ti Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 111 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics P750 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.