Radeon RX 7900 XT vs UHD Graphics P630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with Radeon RX 7900 XT, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics P630
2018
15 Watt
6.40

RX 7900 XT outperforms UHD Graphics P630 by a whopping 1075% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking57514
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.76
Power efficiency29.2417.17
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT2Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 May 2018 (6 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925376
Core clock speed350 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2394 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80804.4
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs3192
TMUs24336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data800.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.40
RX 7900 XT 75.19
+1075%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
RX 7900 XT 28968
+1075%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−1181%
205
+1181%
1440p10−12
−1230%
133
+1230%
4K7−8
−1129%
86
+1129%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.39
1440pno data6.76
4Kno data10.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−11750%
237
+11750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5000%
150−160
+5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10500%
212
+10500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3250%
260−270
+3250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7900%
300−350
+7900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−446%
150−160
+446%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5000%
150−160
+5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−9400%
190
+9400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3250%
260−270
+3250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−12200%
492
+12200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1700%
160−170
+1700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−446%
150−160
+446%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5000%
150−160
+5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8850%
179
+8850%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4275%
350
+4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−10500%
424
+10500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−2844%
265
+2844%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−446%
150−160
+446%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 122
Hitman 3 6−7
−1717%
100−110
+1717%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−13750%
277
+13750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6200%
60−65
+6200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 60−65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 141
+0%
141
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 325
+0%
325
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+0%
159
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
+0%
173
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is 1181% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XT is 1230% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XT is 1129% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 13750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.40 75.19
Recency 24 May 2018 3 November 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 1900% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has a 1074.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1794 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.