Radeon RX 6400 vs UHD Graphics P630

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics P630
2018
15 Watt
6.41

RX 6400 outperforms UHD Graphics P630 by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking576281
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.19
Power efficiency29.4825.84
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT2Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 May 2018 (6 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speed350 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2321 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80111.4
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs2448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.41
RX 6400 19.85
+210%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
RX 6400 7632
+210%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Elden Ring 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
Valorant 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Dota 2 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Elden Ring 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Fortnite 35−40
−189%
110−120
+189%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−202%
160−170
+202%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Valorant 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%
World of Tanks 100−110
−197%
300−310
+197%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−200%
60−65
+200%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Dota 2 21−24
−195%
65−70
+195%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−193%
85−90
+193%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−202%
160−170
+202%
Valorant 18−20
−189%
55−60
+189%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Elden Ring 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−197%
110−120
+197%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
World of Tanks 45−50
−204%
140−150
+204%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−200%
24−27
+200%
Valorant 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Elden Ring 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−206%
55−60
+206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 16−18
−194%
50−55
+194%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Fortnite 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Valorant 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.41 19.85
Recency 24 May 2018 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 53 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 253.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6400, on the other hand, has a 209.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics P630 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2036 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.