GeForce GT 750M vs UHD Graphics P630

Place in the ranking	575	727
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.34	4.75
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Coffee Lake GT2	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2018 (6 years ago)	9 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	384
Core clock speed	350 MHz	941 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	967 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.80	30.94
Floating-point processing power	0.4608 TFLOPS	0.7427 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	16
TMUs	24	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Standard memory configuration	no data	DDR3/GDDR5
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1003 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	64.19 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support	no data	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
HDMI	-	+
HDCP content protection	-	+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	-	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	-	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	-	+
Optimus	-	+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	-	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 API
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	3.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.40
+85.5%

GT 750M 3.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
+85.5%

GT 750M 1329

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

35−40
+75%

−75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−200%

6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −233%	30 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +80%	5 −80%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −46.4%	40−45 +46.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	2−3
Hitman 3	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−250%

7−8
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10

+0%

9−10

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and GT 750M compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics P630 is 75% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 80% faster.
in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 750M is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics P630 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
GT 750M is ahead in 28 tests (46%)
there's a draw in 32 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.40	3.45
Recency	24 May 2018	9 January 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has a 85.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 750M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.