Radeon 740M vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Place in the ranking	901	515
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	13.79	38.07
Architecture	Gen. 11 (2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Gen. 11	Phoenix
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	11 January 2021 (4 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	256
Core clock speed	350 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	2500 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	4.8 - 10 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	40.00
Floating-point processing power	no data	2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	16
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	no data	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1.93

Radeon 740M 7.99
+314%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1589

Radeon 740M 7490
+371%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1016

Radeon 740M 5135
+405%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 330

Radeon 740M 1699
+415%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−163%

21
+163%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Forza Horizon 4	10 −370%	47 +370%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1000%	21−24 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −188%	21−24 +188%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −16.7%	14 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Dota 2	5 −500%	30 +500%
Far Cry 5	11 −90.9%	21 +90.9%
Fortnite	10−11 −390%	45−50 +390%
Forza Horizon 4	9 −311%	37 +311%
Grand Theft Auto V	2 −1350%	27−30 +1350%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1000%	21−24 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −230%	65−70 +230%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −188%	21−24 +188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −178%	24−27 +178%
World of Tanks	35−40 −218%	120−130 +218%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Dota 2	11 −309%	45−50 +309%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	13 −131%	30 +131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −230%	65−70 +230%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	10−11
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
World of Tanks	12−14 −362%	60−65 +362%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	14−16
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −183%	16−18 +183%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Valorant	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −18.8%	18−20 +18.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −26.7%	18−20 +26.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Dota 2	16−18 −306%	65−70 +306%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Fortnite	0−1	8−9
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	5−6
Valorant	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Valorant	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Valorant	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Valorant	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2

10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

Radeon 740M is 163% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 740M is 1350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 740M is ahead in 45 tests (78%)
there's a draw in 13 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.93	7.99
Recency	11 January 2021	4 January 2023
Chip lithography	10 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	4 Watt	15 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has 275% lower power consumption.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has a 314% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.