Radeon 740M vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and Radeon 740M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
2021
4 Watt
1.99

740M outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking901516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.7337.86
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGen. 11Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32256
Core clock speed350 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data40.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.56 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1.99
Radeon 740M 8.23
+314%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1589
Radeon 740M 7490
+371%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1016
Radeon 740M 5135
+405%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 330
Radeon 740M 1699
+415%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−150%
20
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−520%
31
+520%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−360%
23
+360%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Far Cry 5 1
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Fortnite 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
Valorant 35−40
−111%
80−85
+111%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−160%
13
+160%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−75%
14
+75%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−215%
120−130
+215%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Dota 2 12
−275%
45−50
+275%
Far Cry 5 1
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Fortnite 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Grand Theft Auto V 2
−1350%
29
+1350%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−400%
20−22
+400%
Valorant 35−40
−111%
80−85
+111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Dota 2 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
Far Cry 5 1
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−567%
20−22
+567%
Valorant 35−40
−111%
80−85
+111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 10−11
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−215%
40−45
+215%
Valorant 14−16
−529%
85−90
+529%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
Valorant 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Dota 2 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is 150% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 740M is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is ahead in 53 tests (85%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (15%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 8.23
Recency 11 January 2021 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has 275% lower power consumption.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has a 313.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 91 vote

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.