L40 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) with L40, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
2021
4 Watt
1.82

L40 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 2846% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking94460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.8813.63
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGen. 11AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)13 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3218176
Core clock speed350 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2490 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,414
Floating-point processing powerno data90.52 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data48 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−2775%
230−240
+2775%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
God of War 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Far Cry 5 1
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Fortnite 8−9
−2775%
230−240
+2775%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2800%
290−300
+2800%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
God of War 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Valorant 35−40
−2738%
1050−1100
+2738%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−2795%
1100−1150
+2795%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Dota 2 12
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Far Cry 5 1
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Fortnite 8−9
−2775%
230−240
+2775%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2800%
290−300
+2800%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
God of War 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
Grand Theft Auto V 2
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Valorant 35−40
−2738%
1050−1100
+2738%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Dota 2 11
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
Far Cry 5 1
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2800%
290−300
+2800%
God of War 6−7
−2733%
170−180
+2733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−2627%
300−310
+2627%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Valorant 35−40
−2738%
1050−1100
+2738%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−2775%
230−240
+2775%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2592%
350−400
+2592%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−2678%
500−550
+2678%
Valorant 12−14
−2592%
350−400
+2592%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
God of War 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2567%
400−450
+2567%
Valorant 9−10
−2789%
260−270
+2789%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
God of War 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and L40 compete in popular games:

  • L40 is 2775% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.82 53.61
Recency 11 January 2021 13 October 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 300 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has 7400% lower power consumption.

L40, on the other hand, has a 2845.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The L40 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook graphics card while L40 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
NVIDIA L40
L40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 27 votes

Rate L40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) or L40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.