GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) with GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
2021
4 Watt
2.00

RTX 2060 12 GB outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 1969% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking89696
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.7715.48
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGen. 11TU106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)7 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322176
Core clock speed350 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt184 Watt
Texture fill rateno data224.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.181 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data136
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−1900%
180−190
+1900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Elden Ring 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 10
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Dota 2 5
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Elden Ring 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Far Cry 5 11
−1900%
220−230
+1900%
Fortnite 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 2
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1900%
400−450
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
World of Tanks 35−40
−1951%
800−850
+1951%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1900%
200−210
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Dota 2 11
−1900%
220−230
+1900%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 13
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1900%
400−450
+1900%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
World of Tanks 12−14
−1900%
260−270
+1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Valorant 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Dota 2 16−18
−1775%
300−310
+1775%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and RTX 2060 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 12 GB is 1900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.00 41.38
Recency 11 January 2021 7 December 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 184 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 4500% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 1969% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

The GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1135 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.