VIA Chrome9 HC vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and VIA Chrome9 HC, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) outperforms VIA Chrome9 HC by a whopping 21700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 847 | 1526 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 24.70 | no data |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | no data |
| GPU code name | Lakefield GT2 | VN896 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 March 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 500 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | onboard |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | onboard |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 13 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+75%
|
24−27
−75%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
+475%
|
8−9
−475%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 15
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+75%
|
24−27
−75%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 15
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+75%
|
24−27
−75%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 20−22 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
+1100%
|
1−2
−1100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 1100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is ahead in 20 tests (95%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.18 | 0.01 |
| Recency | 28 May 2020 | 1 March 2007 |
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has a 21700% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 13 years.
The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Chrome9 HC in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
