Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) with Radeon RX 7650 GRE, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020
7 Watt
2.45

RX 7650 GRE outperforms UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) by a whopping 1643% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking871108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data80.30
Power efficiency24.8518.38
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2020 (5 years ago)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores642048
Core clock speed200 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rateno data345.0
Floating-point processing powerno data22.08 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−1592%
220−230
+1592%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.27

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Fortnite 10−12
−1627%
190−200
+1627%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Valorant 40−45
−1567%
700−750
+1567%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−1639%
800−850
+1639%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Dota 2 15
−1633%
260−270
+1633%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Fortnite 10−12
−1627%
190−200
+1627%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Valorant 40−45
−1567%
700−750
+1567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Dead Island 2 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%
Dota 2 15
−1633%
260−270
+1633%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1567%
150−160
+1567%
Valorant 40−45
−1567%
700−750
+1567%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−1627%
190−200
+1627%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−1606%
290−300
+1606%
Valorant 21−24
−1567%
350−400
+1567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Dead Island 2 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1588%
270−280
+1588%
Valorant 12−14
−1567%
200−210
+1567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dead Island 2 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Dota 2 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%

This is how UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7650 GRE is 1592% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.45 42.71
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 165 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has 2257.1% lower power consumption.

RX 7650 GRE, on the other hand, has a 1643.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.