ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) with Radeon HD 4350, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020
7 Watt
2.32
+495%

Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) outperforms HD 4350 by a whopping 495% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8981327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.471.50
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2RV710
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2020 (5 years ago)30 September 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6480
Core clock speed200 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data242 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.096 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
+85.7%
7
−85.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Valorant 40−45
+61.5%
24−27
−61.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+207%
14−16
−207%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 40−45
+61.5%
24−27
−61.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Valorant 40−45
+61.5%
24−27
−61.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Valorant 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and ATI HD 4350 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 86% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) surpassed ATI HD 4350 in all 31 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 0.39
Recency 28 May 2020 30 September 2008
Chip lithography 10 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 20 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has a 494.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4350 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 16 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 231 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) or Radeon HD 4350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.