Quadro FX 350 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

Place in the ranking	832	1378
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.02	0.72
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	Lakefield GT2	G72
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	28 May 2020 (4 years ago)	20 April 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	no data
Core clock speed	200 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	112 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	21 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	2.200
ROPs	no data	2
TMUs	no data	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	no data	128 MB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	405 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	6.48 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	no data	3.0
OpenGL	no data	2.1
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

13
+1200%

1−2

−1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	8−9	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2	0−1
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11	0−1
Valorant	1−2	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	8−9	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Dota 2	5	0−1
Far Cry 5	9	0−1
Fortnite	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	6−7	0−1
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +1100%	2−3 −1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11	0−1
Valorant	1−2	0−1
World of Tanks	45−50 +1075%	4−5 −1075%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	8−9	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Dota 2	15 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 +1100%	2−3 −1100%
Valorant	1−2	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	18−20 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
World of Tanks	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	3−4	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	0−1
Valorant	9−10	0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Fortnite	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	1−2	0−1
Valorant	2−3	0−1

This is how UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and FX 350 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 1200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.54	0.22
Recency	28 May 2020	20 April 2006
Chip lithography	10 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	21 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has a 1054.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a notebook card while Quadro FX 350 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.