GeForce GT 220 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile UHD Graphics G7 UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
VS
GT 220 GT 220 OEM GT 230 GT 230 OEM GT 240 GT 430 GT 610 GT 630 GT 640 GT 710 GT 730 GT 740

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) with GeForce GT 220, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020
7 Watt
2.52
+342%

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
GT 220 GT 220

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8281210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.090.69
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2GT216
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6448
Core clock speed200 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data486 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data9.840
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1277 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data790 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataVGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−61.5%
21
+61.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and GT 220 compete in popular games:

  • GT 220 is 62% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is ahead in 34 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.52 0.57
Recency 28 May 2020 12 October 2009
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 58 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has a 342.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 728.6% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a notebook card while GeForce GT 220 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
R5 230 Radeon R5 230
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
HD 8750M Radeon HD 8750M
R7 260 Radeon R7 260
vs
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
Instinct MI6 Radeon Instinct MI6
vs
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
HD 6950 Radeon HD 6950
vs
G71 G71
ATI HD 3610 Radeon HD 3610
vs
ATI RS600 RS600
M5000M Quadro M5000M
vs
RTX 4080 Ti GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
HD 6630M Mac Edition Radeon HD 6630M Mac Edition
vs
Jetson Orin NX 8 GB Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
ROG Ally GPU ROG Ally GPU
GTX 980M GeForce GTX 980M
vs
ROG Ally Extreme GPU ROG Ally Extreme GPU
Edge 3D 3400XL Edge 3D 3400XL
vs
RTX 3080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
Sun Sun
vs
RX 7900 GRE Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 756 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.