Radeon RX 7800 XT vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2019
12 Watt
3.13

RX 7800 XT outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 1915% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking74830
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.84
Power efficiency8.6516.58
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake G1 Gen. 11Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323840
Core clock speed300 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rateno data583.2
Floating-point processing powerno data37.32 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2438 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data624.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 3.13
RX 7800 XT 63.07
+1915%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 2127
RX 7800 XT 65611
+2985%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 8750
RX 7800 XT 134322
+1435%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 1521
RX 7800 XT 49707
+3168%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 11097
RX 7800 XT 202773
+1727%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 94938
RX 7800 XT 745990
+686%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−1577%
218
+1577%
1440p6−7
−1933%
122
+1933%
4K9
−711%
73
+711%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.29
1440pno data4.09
4Kno data6.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−4200%
258
+4200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−2125%
178
+2125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−22100%
222
+22100%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−3880%
190−200
+3880%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
−1040%
110−120
+1040%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−3117%
193
+3117%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1783%
110−120
+1783%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1788%
150−160
+1788%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1338%
230−240
+1338%
Hitman 3 6
−1967%
120−130
+1967%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−913%
230−240
+913%
Metro Exodus 12
−1192%
150−160
+1192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6
−1867%
110−120
+1867%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1869%
250−260
+1869%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−2800%
261
+2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−18000%
181
+18000%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−3880%
190−200
+3880%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1529%
110−120
+1529%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2583%
161
+2583%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1783%
110−120
+1783%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1788%
150−160
+1788%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1338%
230−240
+1338%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1450%
120−130
+1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−913%
230−240
+913%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−3775%
150−160
+3775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1586%
110−120
+1586%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−3518%
398
+3518%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−843%
130−140
+843%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1344%
130
+1344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−15700%
158
+15700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1529%
110−120
+1529%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2367%
148
+2367%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1783%
110−120
+1783%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1288%
222
+1288%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1450%
120−130
+1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1091%
274
+1091%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−2515%
340
+2515%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−3900%
200
+3900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−272%
145
+272%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1586%
110−120
+1586%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−2700%
140−150
+2700%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1860%
95−100
+1860%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3867%
119
+3867%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4750%
97
+4750%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2333%
70−75
+2333%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2613%
217
+2613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−7250%
147
+7250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−1206%
230−240
+1206%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1650%
100−110
+1650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7200%
70−75
+7200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2950%
60−65
+2950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−4350%
89
+4350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7100%
72
+7100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−16300%
164
+16300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1500%
60−65
+1500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 124
+0%
124
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 148
+0%
148
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 243
+0%
243
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+0%
118
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+0%
130
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 1577% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 1933% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 711% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 22100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is ahead in 62 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.13 63.07
Recency 28 May 2019 25 August 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 263 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has 2091.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 1915% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 364 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2707 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.