GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2019
12 Watt
3.15

RTX 3050 OEM outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 888% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking756181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.6916.51
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake G1 Gen. 11GA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322560
Core clock speed300 MHz1515 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rateno data140.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.986 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−823%
120−130
+823%
4K9
−844%
85−90
+844%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Counter-Strike 2 3
−800%
27−30
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−817%
110−120
+817%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Metro Exodus 8
−838%
75−80
+838%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6
−817%
55−60
+817%
Valorant 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Dota 2 12
−817%
110−120
+817%
Far Cry 5 13
−823%
120−130
+823%
Fortnite 18−20
−844%
170−180
+844%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−809%
100−105
+809%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
−829%
65−70
+829%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 32
−838%
300−310
+838%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%
Valorant 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
World of Tanks 30
−867%
290−300
+867%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Dota 2 20
−850%
190−200
+850%
Far Cry 5 12
−817%
110−120
+817%
Forza Horizon 4 13
−823%
120−130
+823%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−866%
280−290
+866%
Valorant 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−855%
210−220
+855%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
World of Tanks 21−24
−855%
210−220
+855%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
Valorant 10−11
−850%
95−100
+850%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−838%
150−160
+838%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−833%
140−150
+833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−838%
150−160
+838%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Dota 2 9
−844%
85−90
+844%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Fortnite 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Valorant 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and RTX 3050 OEM compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 OEM is 823% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 OEM is 844% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.15 31.12
Recency 28 May 2019 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 130 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has 983.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 OEM, on the other hand, has a 887.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 371 vote

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 175 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.