GeForce GT 1010 vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with GeForce GT 1010, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2019
12 Watt
2.72

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking815811
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.807.36
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameIce Lake G1 Gen. 11GP108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2019 (6 years ago)13 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32256
Core clock speed300 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data23.49
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7516 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data147 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
4K9
+0%
9−10
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 2
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and GT 1010 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 8% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.72 2.73
Recency 28 May 2019 13 January 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 30 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

GT 1010, on the other hand, has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and GeForce GT 1010.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 1010 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010
GeForce GT 1010

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 393 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 564 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) or GeForce GT 1010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.