Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
6750 GRE 10 GB outperforms Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 4527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1158 | 92 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 87.11 |
| Power efficiency | 7.45 | 20.27 |
| Architecture | no data | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Gen. 11 | Navi 22 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (4 years ago) | 17 October 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $309 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 1941 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 2450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.8 - 10 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 352.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 36 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 576 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 80 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 10 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 5
−4500%
| 230−240
+4500%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 1.34 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Fortnite | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−4400%
|
270−280
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−4344%
|
400−450
+4344%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−4416%
|
1400−1450
+4416%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24−27
−4500%
|
1150−1200
+4500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
| Dota 2 | 6
−4400%
|
270−280
+4400%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Fortnite | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−4400%
|
270−280
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−4344%
|
400−450
+4344%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−4400%
|
270−280
+4400%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−4416%
|
1400−1450
+4416%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
| Dota 2 | 5
−4500%
|
230−240
+4500%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−4400%
|
270−280
+4400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−4344%
|
400−450
+4344%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−4400%
|
270−280
+4400%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−4416%
|
1400−1450
+4416%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−4400%
|
180−190
+4400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 6−7
−4400%
|
270−280
+4400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−4400%
|
450−500
+4400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 3−4
−4233%
|
130−140
+4233%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−4233%
|
130−140
+4233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−4186%
|
600−650
+4186%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−4500%
|
230−240
+4500%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−4400%
|
90−95
+4400%
|
This is how UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) and RX 6750 GRE 10 GB compete in popular games:
- RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 4500% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.97 | 44.88 |
| Recency | 11 January 2021 | 17 October 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 170 Watt |
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) has 4150% lower power consumption.
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, on the other hand, has a 4526.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
