Jetson T4000 vs UHD Graphics 920

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2GB10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data27 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed400 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2525 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data161.6
Floating-point processing powerno data7.757 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data243 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataLPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountno data64 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1067 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data273.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

UHD Graphics 920 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

Jetson T4000, on the other hand, has a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 920 and Jetson T4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 920 is a desktop graphics card while Jetson T4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 920
UHD Graphics 920
NVIDIA Jetson T4000
Jetson T4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 85 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson T4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 920 or Jetson T4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.