Jetson T4000 vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking823not rated
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Power efficiency14.57no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2GB10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2017 (8 years ago)27 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1841536
Core clock speed350 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45161.6
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS7.757 TFLOPS
ROPs316
TMUs2364
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data243 mm
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1067 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data273.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.103N/A
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 27 August 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

Jetson T4000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Jetson T4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop graphics card while Jetson T4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Jetson T4000
Jetson T4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4563 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson T4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 630 or Jetson T4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.