ATI Radeon Xpress X1250 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 436 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 64.32 | no data |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | RS690M |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (5 years ago) | 1 February 2007 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 128 MB |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 1 February 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 80 nm |
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Radeon Xpress X1250. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
