ATI Radeon X1950 XTX vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking433not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency63.83no data
Architectureno dataR500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1R580+
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (4 years ago)17 October 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data384 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.40
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data230 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR4
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 17 October 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 14 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Radeon X1950 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1950 XTX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
ATI Radeon X1950 XTX
Radeon X1950 XTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 134 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 11 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) or Radeon X1950 XTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.