ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking436not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency64.32no data
Architectureno dataRV6xx (2008−2010)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (5 years ago)1 August 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Manufacturing process technology14 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 1 August 2010

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 10 years.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Mobility Radeon HD 3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 136 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 66 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) or Mobility Radeon HD 3400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.