GeForce GT 340 OEM vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking372not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency64.15no data
Architectureno dataTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1GT215
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)2 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data727 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rateno data17.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2573 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data850 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data27.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 2 February 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 69 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 11 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 360% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce GT 340 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while GeForce GT 340 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
GeForce GT 340 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 110 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 31 vote

Rate GeForce GT 340 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.