GeForce2 Go 100 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking432not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency63.80no data
Architectureno dataCelsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1NV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (4 years ago)6 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speedno data125 MHz
Number of transistorsno data20 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.5
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data16 MB
Memory bus widthno data32 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.328 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data7.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 6 February 2001
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 2 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go 100, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce2 Go 100. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
GeForce2 Go 100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 134 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) or GeForce2 Go 100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.