FirePro D700 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) with FirePro D700, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
2021
15 Watt
14.05
+0.1%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking369370
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency64.753.54
Architectureno dataGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)18 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt274 Watt
Texture fill rateno data108.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.482 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1370 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data263.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
+20%
10−12
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Hitman 3 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+6.7%
75−80
−6.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Hitman 3 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+6.7%
75−80
−6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Hitman 3 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+6.7%
75−80
−6.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Hitman 3 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Hitman 3 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and FirePro D700 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 20% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.05 14.04
Recency 30 March 2021 18 January 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 274 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 0.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1726.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and FirePro D700.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while FirePro D700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 114 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 37 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.