RTX A1000 Embedded vs UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) with RTX A1000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
2022
6.27

RTX A1000 Embedded outperforms UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) by a whopping 309% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking558208
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data58.10
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeGA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores642048
Core clock speedno data630 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHz1140 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data72.96
Floating-point processing powerno data4.669 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−305%
85−90
+305%
1440p11
−309%
45−50
+309%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−294%
130−140
+294%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
−289%
70−75
+289%
Hogwarts Legacy 17
−282%
65−70
+282%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−294%
130−140
+294%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−300%
60−65
+300%
Far Cry 5 18
−289%
70−75
+289%
Fortnite 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%
Forza Horizon 5 25
−300%
100−105
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 12
−275%
45−50
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Valorant 70−75
−305%
300−310
+305%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−294%
130−140
+294%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−309%
450−500
+309%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
Dota 2 53
−296%
210−220
+296%
Far Cry 5 19
−295%
75−80
+295%
Fortnite 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%
Forza Horizon 5 22
−309%
90−95
+309%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
−275%
45−50
+275%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Metro Exodus 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−291%
90−95
+291%
Valorant 70−75
−305%
300−310
+305%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Dota 2 49
−308%
200−210
+308%
Far Cry 5 18
−289%
70−75
+289%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
Valorant 22
−309%
90−95
+309%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−304%
210−220
+304%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−300%
24−27
+300%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%
Valorant 75−80
−290%
300−310
+290%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Far Cry 5 14
−293%
55−60
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Valorant 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Dota 2 24−27
−296%
95−100
+296%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%

This is how UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) and RTX A1000 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 305% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 309% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.27 25.65
Recency 4 January 2022 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm

RTX A1000 Embedded has a 309.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A1000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
RTX A1000 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 500 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 26 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) or RTX A1000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.