Riva TNT2 PRO vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking720not rated
Place by popularity32not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.37no data
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2NV5 B6
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2017 (6 years ago)12 October 1999 (24 years ago)
Current price$457 no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24no data
Core clock speed300 MHz143 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate26.450.29
Floating-point performance460.8 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1AGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared167 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.672 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.103N/A

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 October 2017 12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 32 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Riva TNT2 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 PRO
Riva TNT2 PRO

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3428 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 20 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.