Quadro NVS 5100M vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 630 with Quadro NVS 5100M, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 630
2017
15 Watt
2.70
+229%

Graphics 630 outperforms 5100M by a whopping 229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8181180
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Power efficiency14.511.89
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GT2xx (2010)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2N10P-NS
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2017 (8 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores18448
Core clock speed350 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45no data
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs23no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.103-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 630 2.70
+229%
NVS 5100M 0.82

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 630 7704
+192%
NVS 5100M 2634

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
+240%
5−6
−240%
1440p10
+233%
3−4
−233%
4K7
+250%
2−3
−250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 27
+238%
8−9
−238%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5
−20%
6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 19
+280%
5−6
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Valorant 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 29
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Fortnite 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 3
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Valorant 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Valorant 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Valorant 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and NVS 5100M compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 630 is 240% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 630 is 233% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics 630 is 250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 630 is 700% faster.
  • in Hogwarts Legacy, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the NVS 5100M is 20% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 630 performs better in 36 tests (97%)
  • NVS 5100M performs better in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.70 0.82
Recency 1 October 2017 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has a 229.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
Quadro NVS 5100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4507 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 630 or Quadro NVS 5100M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.