GeForce 9650M GT vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking720not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.37no data
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2NB9P-GT
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (6 years ago)19 August 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price$457 $49

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2432
CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed300 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate26.458.800
Floating-point performance460.8 gflops84.8 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 630 and GeForce 9650M GT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1MXM-II
WidthIGPno data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Maximum VGA resolutionno data1920x1200

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1.103N/A
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 630 1192
+770%
9650M GT 137

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 9650M GT by 770% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 630 7704
+490%
9650M GT 1306

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms GeForce 9650M GT by 490% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 October 2017 19 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and GeForce 9650M GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while GeForce 9650M GT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GeForce 9650M GT

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3424 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.