GeForce 7300 GT Mac Edition vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking856not rated
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Power efficiency12.51no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2G73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)26 August 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rate24.001.400
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2017 26 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 24 Watt

UHD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce 7300 GT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 620 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 7300 GT Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT Mac Edition
GeForce 7300 GT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4976 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 620 or GeForce 7300 GT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.