ATI Radeon X1300 CE vs UHD Graphics 605

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1124not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.51no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1.5RV505
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)27 October 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144no data
Core clock speed200 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate13.501.400
Floating-point processing power0.216 TFLOPSno data
ROPs34
TMUs184

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2017 27 October 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 27 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 440% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 605 and Radeon X1300 CE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1300 CE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605
ATI Radeon X1300 CE
Radeon X1300 CE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 893 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1300 CE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 605 or Radeon X1300 CE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.