Radeon RX 560X vs UHD Graphics 605

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 605 with Radeon RX 560X, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 605
2017
5 Watt
1.02

RX 560X outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by a whopping 627% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1117549
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.427.96
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1.5Polaris 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1441024
Core clock speed200 MHz1175 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1275 MHz
Number of transistors189 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate13.5081.60
Floating-point processing power0.216 TFLOPS2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs316
TMUs1864
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 605 1.02
RX 560X 7.42
+627%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 605 453
RX 560X Samples: 39 3280
+624%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−608%
85−90
+608%
1440p24
−608%
170−180
+608%
4K15
−567%
100−110
+567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Fortnite 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Valorant 30−35
−619%
230−240
+619%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−592%
180−190
+592%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Dota 2 7
−614%
50−55
+614%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Fortnite 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Valorant 30−35
−619%
230−240
+619%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Dota 2 7
−614%
50−55
+614%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1
−600%
7−8
+600%
Valorant 30−35
−619%
230−240
+619%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−627%
80−85
+627%
Valorant 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Valorant 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

This is how UHD Graphics 605 and RX 560X compete in popular games:

  • RX 560X is 608% faster in 1080p
  • RX 560X is 608% faster in 1440p
  • RX 560X is 567% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.02 7.42
Recency 11 December 2017 11 April 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 75 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has 1400% lower power consumption.

RX 560X, on the other hand, has a 627.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

The Radeon RX 560X is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 605 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 560X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605
AMD Radeon RX 560X
Radeon RX 560X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 889 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 441 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 605 or Radeon RX 560X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.