Radeon RX 9070 vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
VS
Radeon RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 9060 XT Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 600 with Radeon RX 9070, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 600
2017
5 Watt
0.75

RX 9070 outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by a whopping 7551% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
RX 9070 RX 9070

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking114633
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.19
Power efficiency11.9220.72
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)6 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584
Core clock speed200 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors189 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate7.800564.5
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS36.13 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs12224
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan+1.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 600 0.75
RX 9070 57.38
+7551%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 600 334
RX 9070 25638
+7576%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−7400%
750−800
+7400%
1440p1
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.73
1440pno data7.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−6367%
190−200
+6367%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7700%
150−160
+7700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−6367%
190−200
+6367%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7700%
150−160
+7700%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4800%
240−250
+4800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
170−180
+2113%
Valorant 13
−2577%
300−350
+2577%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−6367%
190−200
+6367%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1164%
270−280
+1164%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7700%
150−160
+7700%
Dota 2 7
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4800%
240−250
+4800%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−15700%
150−160
+15700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
170−180
+2113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5060%
250−260
+5060%
Valorant 11
−3064%
300−350
+3064%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7700%
150−160
+7700%
Dota 2 7
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4800%
240−250
+4800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
170−180
+2113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5060%
250−260
+5060%
Valorant 30−33
−1060%
300−350
+1060%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−11750%
450−500
+11750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 85−90
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−10350%
200−210
+10350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−14200%
140−150
+14200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−15000%
150−160
+15000%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 55−60
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−913%
150−160
+913%
Valorant 4−5
−8125%
300−350
+8125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40−45
Far Cry 5 1−2
−9700%
95−100
+9700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and RX 9070 compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 is 7400% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 is 7400% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 9070 is 15700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 9070 is ahead in 30 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.75 57.38
Recency 11 December 2017 6 March 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 220 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has 4300% lower power consumption.

RX 9070, on the other hand, has a 7550.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 9070 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
AMD Radeon RX 9070
Radeon RX 9070
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
HD 6620G Radeon HD 6620G
RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070
vs
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
HD 8310E Radeon HD 8310E
Tesla P100 SXM2 Tesla P100 SXM2
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
RX 9070 RX 9070
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
RX Vega M RX Vega M
vs
RX 9070 XT 9070 XT
RX Vega M RX Vega M
vs
RX 9070 9070
RX Vega M RX Vega M
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
GTX 1060 5 GB GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 3729 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 202 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 600 or Radeon RX 9070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.