ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 600 with Mobility FireGL V5700, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 600
2017
5 Watt
0.76
+130%

Graphics 600 outperforms Mobility V5700 by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11861340
Place by popularity71not in top-100
Power efficiency12.24no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1M86
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)7 January 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96120
Core clock speed200 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.8004.800
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS0.144 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs128
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 600 0.76
+130%
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 0.33

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 600 2189
+115%
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 1017

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
+150%
4−5
−150%
1440p1-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 13
−100%
24−27
+100%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 11
−136%
24−27
+136%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 30−33
+15.4%
24−27
−15.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 600 is 150% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics 600 is 100% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 is 136% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 600 performs better in 22 tests (76%)
  • ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 performs better in 4 tests (14%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 0.33
Recency 11 December 2017 7 January 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm

UHD Graphics 600 has a 130.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility FireGL V5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while Mobility FireGL V5700 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Mobility FireGL V5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3935 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 600 or Mobility FireGL V5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.