FireStream 9270 vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 600 with FireStream 9270, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 600
2017
5 Watt
0.80

FireStream 9270 outperforms Graphics 600 by a whopping 301% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1205798
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Power efficiency12.321.54
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1RV770
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 December 2017 (8 years ago)13 November 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96800
Core clock speed200 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate7.80030.00
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs1240
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data115.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 600 0.80
FireStream 9270 3.21
+301%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 600 334
FireStream 9270 1341
+301%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−300%
40−45
+300%
1440p1
−300%
4−5
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Valorant 13
−285%
50−55
+285%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Dota 2 7
−286%
27−30
+286%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Valorant 11
−264%
40−45
+264%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Dota 2 7
−286%
27−30
+286%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Valorant 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Valorant 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

This is how UHD Graphics 600 and FireStream 9270 compete in popular games:

  • FireStream 9270 is 300% faster in 1080p
  • FireStream 9270 is 300% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 3.21
Recency 11 December 2017 13 November 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 160 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 3100% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9270, on the other hand, has a 301.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The FireStream 9270 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while FireStream 9270 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
AMD FireStream 9270
FireStream 9270

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 4120 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 600 or FireStream 9270, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.