Radeon HD 6310 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking811not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeZacate
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)16 November 2010 (13 years ago)
Current priceno data$461

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2480
Core clock speed450 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data450 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.936

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Radeon HD 6310 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno dataN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 1490
+493%
HD 6310 251

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) outperforms Radeon HD 6310 by 493% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 5776
+736%
HD 6310 691

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) outperforms Radeon HD 6310 by 736% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 16 November 2010
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Radeon HD 6310. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Radeon HD 6310

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 44 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 224 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.