UHD Graphics 770 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.95
+61.3%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking455583
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Power efficiencyno data28.32
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96256
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.95
+61.3%
UHD Graphics 770 6.17

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+45.9%
UHD Graphics 770 3428

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+57.9%
19
−57.9%
4K21−24
+50%
14
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Fortnite 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+73.9%
23
−73.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+71.1%
45−50
−71.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Valorant 35−40
+131%
16
−131%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Dota 2 35−40
+80%
20
−80%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+36.7%
30
−36.7%
Fortnite 55−60
+61.1%
35−40
−61.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+122%
18
−122%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+289%
9
−289%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+51%
50−55
−51%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Valorant 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
World of Tanks 140−150
+45.9%
95−100
−45.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Dota 2 35−40
−11.1%
40
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+46.4%
27−30
−46.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+150%
16
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+51%
50−55
−51%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+65.7%
35−40
−65.7%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+69.2%
12−14
−69.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Valorant 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Dota 2 20−22
+42.9%
14
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Elden Ring 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Elden Ring 11
+0%
11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Elden Ring 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
World of Tanks 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 58% faster in 1080p
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 289% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 11% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 33 tests (54%)
  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.95 6.17
Recency 15 August 2020 27 September 2022

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 61.3% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1283 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.