UHD Graphics 770 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.05
+63.1%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450580
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Power efficiencyno data28.15
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96256
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.05
+63.1%
UHD Graphics 770 6.16

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+45.9%
UHD Graphics 770 3428

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
+50%
18
−50%
4K21−24
+50%
14
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+45.9%
35−40
−45.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+45.9%
35−40
−45.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+77.8%
18
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+65%
40−45
−65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+189%
9
−189%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+132%
18−20
−132%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
+0%
12
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+0%
16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 50% faster in 1080p
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 33 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 37 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.05 6.16
Recency 15 August 2020 27 September 2022

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 63.1% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1267 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.