Radeon RX 8050S vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon RX 8050S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8050S outperforms Tiger Lake-U Graphics G7 by a whopping 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 516 | 155 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | no data |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 32 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 24−27
−292%
| 94
+292%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−210%
|
120−130
+210%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−233%
|
100
+233%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−184%
|
150−160
+184%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−241%
|
140−150
+241%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−326%
|
140−150
+326%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−137%
|
210−220
+137%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−210%
|
120−130
+210%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
−94.4%
|
270−280
+94.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−282%
|
260−270
+282%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−220%
|
96
+220%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−184%
|
150−160
+184%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−241%
|
140−150
+241%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
−237%
|
118
+237%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−353%
|
85−90
+353%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−326%
|
140−150
+326%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−550%
|
156
+550%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−137%
|
210−220
+137%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−210%
|
120−130
+210%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−282%
|
260−270
+282%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−183%
|
85
+183%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−241%
|
140−150
+241%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−326%
|
140−150
+326%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−283%
|
92
+283%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
−184%
|
150−160
+184%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−259%
|
250−260
+259%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−517%
|
70−75
+517%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
−420%
|
50−55
+420%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
−139%
|
240−250
+139%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−309%
|
90−95
+309%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−335%
|
85−90
+335%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−364%
|
100−110
+364%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 20−22
−375%
|
95−100
+375%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
−290%
|
75−80
+290%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−560%
|
30−35
+560%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−470%
|
55−60
+470%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−353%
|
220−230
+353%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
−427%
|
55−60
+427%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
−271%
|
130−140
+271%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−422%
|
45−50
+422%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−325%
|
65−70
+325%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−422%
|
45−50
+422%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
−411%
|
45−50
+411%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and RX 8050S compete in popular games:
- RX 8050S is 292% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 8050S is 560% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 8050S performs better in 39 tests (72%)
- there's a draw in 15 tests (28%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
