Radeon R5 230 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with Radeon R5 230, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.13
+1623%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms R5 230 by a whopping 1623% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4981263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.13
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeCaicos
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)3 April 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96160
Number of transistorsno data370 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data19 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 1.0 x4
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataN/A

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory bandwidthno data10.67 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity-+
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
​PowerPlayno data+
DDMA audiono data-
Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX® 11
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Fortnite 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Valorant 90−95
+1700%
5−6
−1700%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+1675%
8−9
−1675%
Dota 2 65−70
+2167%
3−4
−2167%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Fortnite 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Valorant 90−95
+1700%
5−6
−1700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Dota 2 65−70
+2167%
3−4
−2167%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+1767%
3−4
−1767%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
Valorant 100−110
+1960%
5−6
−1960%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.13 0.53
Recency 15 August 2020 3 April 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 1622.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 230 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R5 230 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 256 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or Radeon R5 230, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.