Quadro NVS 130M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with Quadro NVS 130M, including specs and performance data.
Tiger Lake-U Graphics G7 outperforms 130M by a whopping 3891% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 508 | 1431 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.78 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | G86 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 210 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 10 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.0128 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 4 |
| TMUs | no data | 4 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 16 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 11.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 55−60
+5600%
|
1−2
−5600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1267%
|
3−4
−1267%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+386%
|
7−8
−386%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+264%
|
24−27
−264%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+1092%
|
12−14
−1092%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+656%
|
9−10
−656%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 55−60
+5600%
|
1−2
−5600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1267%
|
3−4
−1267%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+386%
|
7−8
−386%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+380%
|
5−6
−380%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+264%
|
24−27
−264%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+656%
|
9−10
−656%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1267%
|
3−4
−1267%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+386%
|
7−8
−386%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+380%
|
5−6
−380%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
+5600%
|
1−2
−5600%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+7100%
|
1−2
−7100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 100−110
+5100%
|
2−3
−5100%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+2100%
|
1−2
−2100%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+42.9%
|
14−16
−42.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 45−50
+4800%
|
1−2
−4800%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 4800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 performs better in 19 tests (70%)
- there's a draw in 8 tests (30%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.18 | 0.23 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 9 May 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 80 nm |
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 3891.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 130M in performance tests.
Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 130M is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
