GeForce RTX 3070 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with GeForce RTX 3070, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.05

RTX 3070 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 477% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking45042
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.65
Power efficiencyno data18.06
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores965888
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data220 Watt
Texture fill rateno data317.4
Floating-point processing powerno data20.31 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.05
RTX 3070 58.00
+477%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
RTX 3070 31020
+520%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−521%
149
+521%
1440p16−18
−519%
99
+519%
4K10−12
−510%
61
+510%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.35
1440pno data5.04
4Kno data8.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−421%
125
+421%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−494%
180−190
+494%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−445%
100−110
+445%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−239%
220−230
+239%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−307%
220−230
+307%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−337%
118
+337%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−628%
230−240
+628%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−494%
180−190
+494%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−445%
100−110
+445%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−239%
220−230
+239%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−307%
220−230
+307%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−365%
144
+365%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−322%
110−120
+322%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−697%
255
+697%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−365%
120−130
+365%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−238%
81
+238%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−448%
170−180
+448%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−471%
160−170
+471%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−239%
220−230
+239%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−365%
121
+365%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−450%
110−120
+450%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−471%
80−85
+471%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−477%
75−80
+477%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−580%
68
+580%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−518%
65−70
+518%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−516%
270−280
+516%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−419%
210−220
+419%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1238%
107
+1238%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1186%
90
+1186%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−700%
48
+700%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 147
+0%
147
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
+0%
100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 139
+0%
139
+0%
Hitman 3 109
+0%
109
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 174
+0%
174
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
+0%
87
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 126
+0%
126
+0%
Hitman 3 116
+0%
116
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 178
+0%
178
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Hitman 3 111
+0%
111
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 181
+0%
181
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 223
+0%
223
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
+0%
85
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 116
+0%
116
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
+0%
65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Hitman 3 96
+0%
96
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 101
+0%
101
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
+0%
166
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 175
+0%
175
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114
+0%
114
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hitman 3 52
+0%
52
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+0%
43
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+0%
97
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+0%
38
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69
+0%
69
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 521% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 is 519% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 is 510% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 is 1238% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is ahead in 33 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.05 58.00
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm

RTX 3070 has a 477.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11281 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.