GeForce GTX 560 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with GeForce GTX 560, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.03
+40.7%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GTX 560 by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking446540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.74
Power efficiencyno data3.39
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGF114
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)17 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96336
Core clock speedno data810 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data99 °C
Texture fill rateno data45.36
Floating-point processing powerno data1.089 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.03
+40.7%
GTX 560 7.13

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+65%
GTX 560 3030

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.03 7.13
Recency 15 August 2020 17 May 2011
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 40.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 560 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GeForce GTX 560

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1045 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.