GeForce FX Go5700 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce FX Go5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
8.76
+7200%

Tiger Lake-U Graphics G7 outperforms Go5700 by a whopping 7200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5051492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNV36
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)1 February 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data82 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm130 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.800
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_19.0a
OpenGLno data1.5 (2.1)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Far Cry 5 30−33 0−1
Fortnite 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
Valorant 90−95
+9000%
1−2
−9000%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+14200%
1−2
−14200%
Dota 2 65−70 0−1
Far Cry 5 30−33 0−1
Fortnite 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 0−1
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1
Valorant 90−95
+9000%
1−2
−9000%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Dota 2 65−70 0−1
Far Cry 5 30−33 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
Valorant 100−110
+10300%
1−2
−10300%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12 0−1
Dota 2 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.76 0.12
Recency 15 August 2020 1 February 2005
Chip lithography 10 nm 130 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 7200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go5700 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5700
GeForce FX Go5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX Go5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or GeForce FX Go5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.