RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Tesla X2070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated48
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.93
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF110AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126144
Core clock speed651 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate41.66417.6
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache1 MB6 MB
L2 Cache768 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB20 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 130 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has an age advantage of 12 years, a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 73.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla X2070 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla X2070
Tesla X2070
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 65 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla X2070 or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.