Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs Tesla V100 SXM2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated689
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.24
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGV100Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 June 2017 (7 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512048
Core clock speed1370 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate438.4no data
ROPs128no data
TMUs320no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1758 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth900.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2017 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 12 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1983.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 SXM2 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla V100 SXM2 is a workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
Tesla V100 SXM2
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 44 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 57 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.