ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP vs Tesla T4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking263not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.62no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameTU104RS600
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 September 2018 (7 years ago)28 February 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed585 MHz501 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million120 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate254.42.004
Floating-point processing power8.141 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1604
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache2.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2018 28 February 2007
Chip lithography 12 nm 90 nm

Tesla T4 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla T4 and Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla T4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4
ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP
Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 268 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla T4 or Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.