ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP vs Quadro RTX 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking144not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.03no data
Power efficiency12.29no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameTU104RS600
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)28 February 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed1620 MHz501 MHz
Boost clock speed1815 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million120 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate348.52.004
Floating-point processing power11.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1924
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data
L1 Cache3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2018 28 February 2007
Chip lithography 12 nm 90 nm

RTX 5000 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro RTX 5000 and Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Quadro RTX 5000
ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP
Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 243 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro RTX 5000 or Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.